Saturday, January 31, 2026

Galindos

The first one has a raven in his name.

They say he was called Galindo Belasko, which is to say: the little crow who lent his name to a valley where the wind never decided between Christian and Moor, somewhere in the folds of old Navarre, where the Pyrenees have the shape of a clenched fist. I imagine him leaning on a stick, watching sheep, watching soldiers, watching the way the fog would come climbing out of the ravines like a patient army. Behind his back the old Basque words curled around stones and springs; in front of him, priests recited Latin and kings signed charters with quivering quills. In the middle, like a bridge the earth had invented, stood Galindo with his black little bird-name, which would someday be a thread pulled taut across oceans.

From him the name steps forward, clumsy and luminous, into Sancho Galindo. The scribes in the monastery write his name as if it were a fence-post: Sanctius Galindus, and the ink dries unevenly on the vellum. He is a frontier man, a watcher. In one version of the story he holds a lance; in another he merely walks the line of some poor king’s frontier, taking note of streams, orchards, and the forbidden houses of heretics. The priests talk about souls, the captains talk about land, but in Sancho’s head there is only this thought: the world is an ambiguous hill, and my children will live further down that slope.

His son Martín Sánchez de Galindo tilts the hill a little more. The old raven feathers are still in the blood, but the language around them begins to change. He hears Aragonese, Castilian, Latin, a long slow crush of consonants. He marries a woman who pronounces his name with a softer “l” and he doesn’t correct her. The war with the Moors is a rumor that comes and goes like a bad winter; sometimes Martín marches in a column of men, sometimes he is back on his plot of land, pushing seed into the soil. The land is a god who doesn’t talk but remembers everything, including the feel of their heavy boots.

Then Lope Martín de Galindo, born in the Ebro valley where reeds whisper against the current and the river has eaten so many corpses it no longer bothers to distinguish them. Lope is one of those men who always seems to be on the road. He carries wheat, salt, messages. He follows the rumor of land grants the way bees follow the idea of a flower. Monks draw his name on thin parchment: Luppus Martini de Galindo. He hears that somewhere far away, beyond Toledo, beyond Sevilla, there are ships that will cross a sea that never ends. He doesn’t know that his blood will board one of them, centuries later.

Generations thicken, like paint on a wall that no one ever strips. Íñigo López Galindo, García Íñiguez Galindo, Pedro García Galindo—they plow, they breed, they fight in wars whose causes they never fully understand. Kings change like cloud patterns. Famine visits the poor; plague visits everyone. The name Galindo drifts between them like a small black boat on a flooded plain. The accents shift. Basque edges soften, Castilian vowels harden. The mountains remember the first raven but no one else does.

In Juan Pérez Galindo, Domingo Juanes Galindo, Ferrán Domínguez Galindo, the family folds more completely into Castile. The frontier is further south now. Moorish villages become Christian by decree and remain Moorish by smell, by spice, by the way the old women mutter over their pots at night. The Galindos live near Toledo for a while. They learn to fear tax collectors, inquisitors, and bad harvests in that order. In one dark year an official accuses a cousin of Judaizing; the cousin disappears into a prison whose stones are older than all of them. The name survives. The cousin does not.

Diego Ferrández Galindo hears about Andalucía as if it were a dream: vineyards, olives, white towns plastered against a sky so bright it cuts the eyes. He follows that brightness south. Now there are gypsies on the road, and poets, and cutthroats. His children are born under a harsher sun. They grow up on stories of the Gran Capitán, of Granada taken, of banners unfurled over the last red walls of the Muslims. Diego does not care about banners. He cares that there is meat in the pot, that the landlord’s men do not come for his eldest boy with pressed papers and smooth threats.

And then this boy, Hernando Díez Galindo, stands one day in the port of Sevilla and looks at the river as if it were a question. The Guadalquivir carries ships fat with silver, saints, weapons, diseases beyond counting. The city is a throat through which the New World passes. Hernando watches men come back from across the ocean with missing arms, with gold rings, with nightmares that leak out of their eyes when they drink and stare at the wall. He is too late, too tired, perhaps too afraid. He does not cross. But his son will.

Alonso Hernández Galindo is the first to risk it. He is not a grand conqueror. No one writes his name in the chronicles of Cortés. He is one of the anonymous multitude, a man with a small inheritance and a larger hunger who signs his name in a cramped hand at the Casa de Contratación and boards a ship that smells of piss, salt, and the future. In the belly of that ship he dreams of Andalusian olive trees as the Atlantic roars around him. The crossing takes weeks, then months; the sea re-sculpts his mind. By the time he reaches Veracruz, something in him has gone flat and shining, like hammered silver.

The New World is not new; it is merely indifferent. Jungle breath pushes in from every direction. The mosquitoes write their own genealogy on his skin. Alonso works where he can—as a minor clerk, as overseer, as a man who knows how to get people to sign their name or mark an “X”. He writes Alonso Hernández Galindo at the bottom of papers that will outlive him. In the evenings, he recalls the way the Pyrenees must smell at the end of winter, although he has never seen them. Blood remembers places the body has never walked.

His son, Rodrigo Alonso Galindo, grows up speaking a New World Castilian, thickened with Nahuatl and Otomí sounds, without Basque or Aragonese in it at all. Rodrigo lives in Veracruz, where the sea is a restless wound and the docks are full of men who curse God fluently in six dialects. Rodrigo believes that the ocean is a god whose only sacrament is repetition. Every wave is the same name mumbled forever. He marries a woman from Puebla. The name Galindo crosses mountains on a mule’s back, in his pocket, in her blood.

Cristóbal Rodrigo Galindo is born in Puebla de los Ángeles, a city that pretends to be a piece of Spain planted on another planet. The churches rise up with all their painted angels, but beyond the walls the indigenous fields continue their own calendar. Cristóbal works between these two realities. He is a carpenter, or maybe a minor official. He writes down the measurements for doors that separate priests from penitents, Spaniards from Indians, legitimate children from the others. But at night he hears talk of the south: a sprawling jurisdiction called Guatemala, a captaincy general whose tendrils reach down into humid valleys and coffee-smelling uplands. And so the line turns again.

Mateo Cristóbal Galindo travels south with a caravan of traders and officials. The road is a long vertebra made of dust and accidents. They pass Chiapas, reach Guatemala, where earthquakes and sermons alternate in the plazas. Mateo settles in Antigua Guatemala for a while. The air there is different. Volcanoes squat around the city like patient, dangerous gods. The name Galindo appears in church books written by ecclesiastical hands that will never know Basque or Andalucía, only Latin and smoke and ash.

But the line is restless. The same nameless hunger that pushed Alonso onto a caravel now pushes Francisco Mateo Galindo eastward, toward rougher country: Chiquimula, perhaps, or the mosaic of villages where the borders of today’s Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador are still fluid, still merely rumors. Francisco lives in a world of mule trains, indigo vats, small wars. His children hear K’iche’, Ch’orti’, and old Castilian in the same marketplace. The name Galindo is pronounced strangely now, stretched over tongues that were made for other syllables.

José Francisco Galindo drifts further, a little south, a little west. Maybe he follows a river; maybe he follows a woman. He ends in a place the Crown calls the Intendencia de San Salvador, a place the local people still know by older names: Cuscatlán, Sonsonate, Izalco. Indigo is king in this time, and king means: a plant that stains your hands blue, that takes your children’s eyes when they stir the vats all day, that builds fortunes for men whose names will be carved in stone. José Francisco is not one of those men. He is a small planter, a hired hand, a man who knows the shape of poverty in three different currencies. But he carries that raven-name intact.

Juan José Galindo is born where Guatemala frays into El Salvador like the edge of a torn flag. He is the first of the line who can truly be called salvadoreño, though no such nation yet exists. The sky is full of omens he doesn’t know how to read: revolts, sermons about equality, rumors of a French general named Bonaparte who walks across Europe like a plague. What Juan José knows are the fields, the debts, the weight of the landlord’s gaze. On Sundays he listens to the priest speak of a Kingdom of Heaven and thinks bitterly that it must be very far from Sonsonate.

After him comes Miguel Juan Galindo, born around 1730 into the indigo economy that will later rot from within. He is alive when Spain begins to weaken, when the Bourbon reforms squeeze and modernize and suffocate. He hears that the King cares about distant men named Voltaire and Rousseau, but no one named Galindo ever appears at court. The family is a line of handwriting in parish archives: baptisms, marriages, burials. Between these sacraments, hunger.

Then José Miguel Galindo opens his eyes around 1765 and watches the whole scaffolding begin to tremble. The United States declares itself; Haiti burns; French heads roll; priests in New Spain begin to murmur about independence. In the Captaincy General of Guatemala, the ideas arrive like badly translated dreams. José Miguel does not read Rousseau. He reads the sky: longer dry seasons, locusts, the sullen resistance of indigo plants. He marries a woman from the interior, maybe somewhere near what will be called Santa Ana. Two lines of blood merge; both of them carry small ancestral birds in their names that no one remembers.

Pedro José Galindo, born around 1795, lives through the end of Spanish rule. He is there—on the margin, among the invisible—when the Central American provinces declare independence in 1821, transfer their allegiance, flirt with Iturbide’s ephemeral empire, and then attempt their own fragile federation. He hears presidents’ names like Iturbide, Arce, Morazán, Carrera, but they might as well be weather systems. What matters is that the patrón remains, the land remains, the lash remains. The flag changes its colors and leaves the fields exactly the same.

Pedro José’s son, Francisco Antonio Galindo, comes into the world around 1830, when the Federation breaks apart like a clay pot dropped from a church tower. Now the small republics sharpen their knives against each other. Francisco Antonio is salvadoreño by decree and tenant by practice. Coffee begins to creep down from the highlands, a dark green wave that will drown the old indigo. Laws change to favor coffee. Communal lands disappear into the mouths of a few oligarchic families. The countryside grows full of ghosts who have lost their plots and gained rifles.

Francisco Antonio moves. Maybe from the west to the central plateau; maybe from a nameless canton to the outskirts of San Salvador. He follows the new crop; he sells his labor to the fincas where coffee trees are lined up like disciplined soldiers. The smell of roasting coffee becomes the smell of the future. He sees a telegraph line for the first time and thinks it is a kind of spider the government has stretched across the country to catch words. The name Galindo has now traveled a thousand years and thousands of kilometers to stand, small and stubborn, in this narrow, volcanic land.

And then, somewhere between 1890 and 1910, in a house whose walls may have been of bahareque or brick, under a roof of tiles that had seen too many rainy seasons, a child is born and they name him Roberto.

We could say: Roberto Galindo, grandson of coffee, great-great-great-grandson of indigo, descendant of maize older than all books, inheritor of the raven that once nested in the Pyrenees. The midwife’s hands are brown and practiced. Perhaps outside, a volcano is emitting its thin column of smoke, a finger raised to remind everyone who really decides. The priest writes Roberto on the baptism register and then Galindo, and does not know he is pinning down a thousand-year journey with that stroke.

Roberto grows up under the dictatorship of the coffee republic, under generals whose faces stare down from schoolroom walls. He walks along roads that his ancestors could not have imagined, lined with telegraph poles, maybe crossed by the tram of a newly installed railway. But other things have not changed at all: the imbalance, the whispers in the cantón, the way the poor learn to make themselves invisible when soldiers ride by. The land has swallowed each generation and given back another.

He is my grandfather, but he is also a corridor. When he laughs, someone in Navarre laughs with him across eight hundred years of stone and mist. When he curses in Salvadoran Spanish, a Basque vowel sometimes stirs in his throat and dissolves before it can be born. His blood has crossed the Atlantic once and Central America twice. It has gone from pagan rites under mountain trees to Catholic mass to skeptical silence; from Gothic lances to machetes in the cane fields; from shepherd paths to ship routes to railways to bus lines rattling toward the capital.

For the Galindos, El Salvador is a kind of culmination: the point where the raven, the spear, the indigo plant, the coffee tree, the volcano, the soldier’s boot, the bureaucrat’s signature, and the child’s soft, uncomprehending eyes all meet and recognize each other for a moment. The family name hangs in the air like a fragile bridge: Galindo, a sound that has been hammered into different shapes by centuries of tongues and still keeps its dark little heart.

If we were to open Roberto’s chest—not in surgery, but in the merciless, tender way of memory—we might find not only the rooms of his own life (his work, his loves, his errors, the way he walked), but also narrow corridors leading back through time. Here a room opens on Veracruz, the hot breath of the docks; here another on the quaking streets of Antigua Guatemala; another on a Pyrenean slope where a boy watches a raven and doesn’t yet know that the bird is his heraldry.

The story does not end with Roberto, of course. The name goes on, broken and mended, carried now by others who do not know any of this. The wars of the twentieth century engrave themselves into the family like new, violent surnames: Martínez, 1932, the disappeared, the war that comes later with helicopters and doctrines imported from the North. El Salvador grows sharper, more unreal, more like a sacrificial altar at the edge of history. And still, everyday life persists in kitchens, in markets, in tired buses. Somewhere in that persistence, someone says Galindo aloud, and the raven flutters once more, invisible, correcting the pronunciation.

We might say that history is a kind of prostitution of the past, that we use the dead to prop up the stories we think we need. We might also say that each ancestor is a black wing beating in the darkness, trying to escape the cage of our own skull. Both are true. This lineage is an invention based on facts, and a fact built out of inventions. The only indisputable thing is that my grandfather Roberto Galindo stood somewhere in El Salvador at the beginning of the twentieth century, breathing, not yet a ghost, not yet a story. The rest is this: a long line of footsteps leading to him across continents, each one leaving a small print shaped like a bird’s foot in the dust.

 

Thursday, December 18, 2025

The Man Who Was Already Everywhere

There is a point where biography stops behaving like history and begins to act like myth.

I did not know this when I first saw him walking the halls of the music department, dressed as if he had wandered in from another century, or perhaps from a diplomatic function I had not been invited to. He moved slowly, deliberately, the way men move when they have rehearsed the choreography of being seen. Suit. Tie. Hat. Leather attaché case carried not as luggage but as an argument. He looked less like another music student than like an emissary sent to observe us. Someone who would later submit a very detailed report.

At the time, I categorized him the way one categorizes strangers whose strangeness is mild enough to be survivable. Another composition student. Another ghost among ghosts. Classical music itself already felt like a ghost—counterpoint, harmony, fugue—studied with seriousness in a world that had already decided it was irrelevant. We were training to become fluent in a dead language, and he, somehow, spoke it as if it were still issuing commands.

Only later did I realize that what unsettled me was not his formality but his certainty. His sentences arrived fully assembled, with no visible drafting. Each idea appeared to have passed through some internal editorial board before reaching the air. He spoke as though the conversation were already being carefully archived. And maybe it was.

He spoke to me, once, about desire—not in the way desire is usually spoken about by young men pretending to be intellectuals, but as if it were a substance. A force. A medium. Something that could be measured, redirected, harnessed. He described desire as energy trapped under social sediment, compressed, distorted, pathogenic when denied expression. Disease, he suggested calmly, often begins as an interruption in the flow of secret wanting. This was not confession. This was bio-engineering.

I remember thinking—without yet having the language for it—that he treated intimacy the way a physicist treats radiation: invisible, potent, dangerous, useful. A thing to be shielded against or weaponized, depending on the application. He spoke of chambers, of sequences, of carefully prepared moments. Time itself seemed to be one of his instruments. I went home unsettled, carrying ideas I had not asked to carry.

Decades later I would discover that the problem was not that his ideas were strange, but that they were dynamic. They did not stay where you put them. They followed you. They rearranged other thoughts in your absence.

At the time, I had no idea that elsewhere, in other rooms, in other networks, his name was already multiplying.


The first time I saw his name detached from his body, it felt wrong in the way a severed hand feels wrong even if it is moving. It was on a screen.

Not his screen. Not my screen. A shared surface, neutral, supposedly objective. Wikipedia, a site that pretended to be an index of the world. His name appeared there as if it had always belonged. As if it were inevitable that it should appear. As if it were strange that it ever hadn’t.

Later I would learn that this page had once existed in more languages than Jesus. This is not metaphor. This is not accusation. This is arithmetic.

Hundreds of translations. Hundreds of edits. Hundreds of small insertions, each one polite, procedural, plausibly deniable. His name carefully stitched into articles where it did not belong: tools, animals, highways, abstract nouns. The effect was cumulative. Like incense burned not to intoxicate but to leave residue.

An editor (anonymous, patient, obsessive in the way that only volunteers can afford to be) noticed something wrong with the pattern. A statistical anomaly. A distorted vibration in the system. And then the excavation began.

Thousands of Sock-puppets. Fake proxies for his invisible hand. Decades of careful repetition. A reputation assembled not by acclaim but by accretion. Not argument, but presence.

I read about it the way one reads about a distant earthquake: with interest, with unease, with a strange sense of recognition. I knew this man. Or I had known a version of him. Or perhaps I had known only the early prototype. It occurred to me that maybe I had always known him too early.


Once, I found a sticker at a bus stop. It was old. Sun-bleached. Half-peeled. The adhesive had given up before the declaration did.

It read:

DAVID WOODARD
SUPREME RULER OF THE UNIVERSE

No irony markers. No context. No explanation. Just assertion.

I stared at it longer than necessary. Long enough to feel foolish. Long enough to feel implicated. Long enough to wonder whether this was propaganda or vandalism, devotion or parody, joke or test.

I did not take it. I did not photograph it. I let it remain where it was, performing its small ritual for whoever else might notice.

Years later, when the giant Wikipedia hoax surfaced, I thought of the sticker again. Not because it explained anything but because it didn’t.


In the spring of 1990, I dreamt of him. This was before the internet had learned how to dream for us.

In the dream, the future was vast and green and wrong. Technology had grown organic interfaces. Machines were carved. Circuits were etched into stone. Cables were braided from leaves and mud. Blue fire moved without burning. Everything functioned, but nothing obeyed the design manuals we had been promised.

He stood at the center of this place not as a ruler but as a facilitator. Someone who knew how to unlock something dangerous without pretending it was safe. He was preparing a birth that had been forbidden not because it was evil but because it was uncontrollable.

He had notebooks. Many of them. Grimoires disguised as research logs. Schematics that refused to stay still. Diagrams that rearranged themselves when not observed directly. Information too dense to survive authority.

They came for him, of course. They always do. They destroyed everything efficiently. No drama. No speeches. Just erasure. When I arrived (too late, always too late) there was nothing left but a broken clay vessel and dust. A workshop reduced to an argument against persistence.

I woke with the sense that I had witnessed not a failure but a rehearsal.


What unsettles me now is not the hoax itself. It is the compatibility between the man I knew and the system that later bloomed around his name.

Wikipedia is not a liar. It is a ritual space governed by repetition, citation, and endurance. Truth there is not declared; it is maintained. To exist is to be defended continuously against deletion. Fame is not achieved—it is kept alive.

And here was a man who already understood that. He understood imbalance. He understood information. He understood that a whole can sometimes be reconstructed from a fragment if the fragment is placed correctly. That desire, when denied a body, will find another substrate. That if you cannot be everywhere physically, you can be everywhere referentially.

I am not accusing him of anything. Accusation implies a court. This feels more like anthropology. I imagine him, younger, with his attaché case, already thinking in terms of systems and large semiotic structures. Already rehearsing persistence. Already aware that the future would belong not to those who shouted but to those who edited patiently.

I imagine him discovering that machines do not need belief, only maintenance.


There are those who claim he composed and conducted music for the dying. There are those who insist he rebuilt a failed colony using sound. There are those who say none of this matters, that the only relevant story is the hoax, the manipulation, the violation of communal trust. All of these can be true simultaneously. The mistake is to think they cancel each other out.

I no longer ask whether he was real in the way biographies demand. I ask instead whether he functioned. And by that metric, the answer is uncomfortable.


Sometimes I wonder if the hoax was not an act of vanity but of faith. A belief that existence itself is a composition problem. A fugue written not in notes but in references. A life scored for hyperlinks.

If so, then perhaps the sticker at the bus stop was not a joke after all, but a condensed manifesto. A title claimed not through conquest but through saturation. Mastery not of matter, but of symbol.


I did not keep in touch with him. I did not confront him. I did not ask him whether the dream was mutual. What remains is this collage made of memory, myth, system error, residue. A man I knew briefly who later became difficult to locate precisely because he was everywhere.

Perhaps that is the final lesson. That in the age of infinite documentation, disappearance no longer requires silence. Only redundancy.


There is an old superstition—older than writing, older even than gods—that to name a thing is not to describe it, but to anchor it. The anchor does not stop the thing from moving. It simply guarantees that wherever it drifts, there will be a line attached, trailing back to whoever spoke first.

In this sense, the encyclopedia is not a book at all. It is a harbor. Each entry is a tether thrown into the dark. Some lines are short and taut. Others disappear into the depths, fray invisibly, reemerge in unexpected coves. Most names sink quietly. A few float. Fewer still begin to pull back.

I have come to think that David Woodard was not writing himself into history but testing the tensile strength of the rope.


There is a point in every myth where the hero is no longer distinguishable from the road. Where the journey ceases to be a sequence of events and becomes a condition imposed on anyone who tries to follow. I suspect that happened early.

Perhaps it happened before I met him, already dressed in his suit, already carrying his attaché case like a portable archive. Perhaps the case did not contain papers so much as protocols. Ways of speaking. Ways of being cited. Ways of existing that did not depend on proximity.

He spoke of imbalance once—not in moral terms, but structural ones. Systems fail, he said, not because they are attacked, but because they are starved of asymmetry. Too much harmony creates stagnation. Too much order invites entropy to reorganize it violently.

What he did not say—but what I now hear retroactively—is that the same is true of memory. If everyone agrees too quickly, the myth dies.


In some versions of the story—and there are many, all incompatible—he invents devices that operate only in liminal states. Machines that require sleep, dying light, the precise moment when attention flickers but does not extinguish. They are useless at noon. They fail under scrutiny. They function best when no one is sure whether they are functioning at all.

One such device, I am told, resembles a simple lamp. Another resembles a page. Another resembles a man walking through a hallway in San Francisco, indistinguishable from a student, except for the faint sensation that he is slightly ahead of the present.


The editors who uncovered the hoax believed they were dismantling a fraud. They were wrong. They were completing a ritual.

Every deletion is a counter-spell. Every citation challenge is a trial by ordeal. Every talk-page argument is a theological dispute disguised as housekeeping. The community believes itself secular, procedural, immune to enchantment—but belief has never required acknowledgment to function.

When they removed his name from the bus stops, from the articles, from the multiple references, they did not erase him. They distributed him. A name survives deletion better than it survives neglect.


There is a legend—unpublished, unattributed, circulating only in marginalia—that says Wikipedia was never meant to be accurate. It was meant to be exhaustive. Not a mirror of the world, but a test of how much the world could tolerate being mirrored before it cracked.

In that legend, certain names become stress points. Insert them often enough, subtly enough, and the structure begins to hum.

I imagine Woodard understood this intuitively. That he saw the encyclopedia not as a platform but as an instrument. A dreamachine scaled to planetary cognition. Spin it fast enough, feed it enough repetition, and consciousness begins to strobe.

Not truth. Attention.


Once, walking past that bus stop again (years after the sticker had vanished) I felt a sudden certainty that the sticker had never been unique. That it had appeared elsewhere. That it had always appeared elsewhere.

Different cities. Different eras. Same phrase. Sometimes handwritten. Sometimes etched. Sometimes spoken casually by people who could not later explain why they said it.

Master of the Universe.

Not a claim. A diagnosis.


In mythic time, there are no hoaxes—only avatars.

The trickster does not lie to deceive; he lies to force interpretation. He introduces false data not to obscure truth but to reveal the machinery by which truth is assembled. When the editors protested—this is not neutral, this is promotional—they were acknowledging the presence of a will strong enough to distort neutrality itself.

That is not nothing. That is power of a very specific kind.


I sometimes think of the dream again, the broken vessel, the dust-covered room. At the time, I believed it was a warning. Now I think it was a misdirection.

What was destroyed was never the work. It was the container.

The notebooks were meant to burn. The devices were meant to fail. The colony was meant to dissolve. These are not tragedies in myth; they are phase transitions. You cannot migrate a god by carrying its furniture. You migrate it by letting it shed weight, its material manifestations.


If Woodard exists now—and I no longer know what that verb means—he exists as a distributed presence. A background process. A pattern-recognition trap. Those who notice him begin to notice other things: the fragility of authority, the porousness of consensus, the way repetition manufactures inevitability. He has become less a person than a test case.

How many times can a name be spoken before it stops referring? How many citations before belief replaces verification? How many deletions before the act of deletion itself becomes a form of invocation?


There is a final version of the myth that says none of this was intentional. That he simply loved systems the way some people love animals or storms. That he fed the encyclopedia the way monks feed candles. One small act at a time, trusting accumulation to do what intention could not.

In that version, the hoax is not a crime but a prayer that worked too well.


I no longer try to decide which version is correct. Correctness is a local phenomenon. What matters is that when I think of him now, I do not picture the man in the suit. I picture instead a field—dense, vibrating, annotated—through which names drift like charged particles. Some decay quickly. Some persist. A very few begin to alter the field itself.

And somewhere in that field, faint but unmistakable, a phrase continues to circulate without origin or destination: Supreme Ruler of the Universe.

Not because it is true, but because it refuses to stop being tested, it refuses to stop vibrating with dislocated life.