Thursday, October 23, 2025

Footprints Under The Wheat

I.

It began with a photocopy.
A piece of paper yellowed at the edges, kept inside a cracked plastic sleeve in the Brentwood Historical Society’s back room. The page had been typed in 1995 by someone named Kathy Leighton—a name that sounded to me like a character from an abandoned Steinbeck story. Across the top of the page, crooked and faint, were the words: JUDGE ROBERT WALLACE.

I read it one afternoon when the air outside shimmered like old glass and the hills around Brentwood looked like the flanks of sleeping animals. The librarian had gone home early. The town felt hollow, like a mouth with too many missing teeth.

The page told me that Robert Wallace Jr. had been “prominent in local politics” and that he had played a key role in “the taming and development of East Contra Costa.” The language was full of those nineteenth-century verbs—taming, founding, settling—that always made me think of violence hidden under a Sunday hat. I imagined the judge’s boots crushing the dry grass, the creak of the first windmill, the faint smell of wheat and blood.

Maybe that was the beginning of the haunting.

II.

At night, I walked through downtown Brentwood, the streets already asleep. Behind the glass of a realtor’s office I saw photos of new subdivisions: houses identical as playing cards, lawns still too green, names like The Estates at Crown Hill or Heritage Meadows—phrases that could easily appear in an old will or a bad poem.

Somewhere beneath these new streets, the judge’s fields were buried. The text said he had been “one of the first wheat growers in the region.” I tried to imagine what it meant to grow wheat in 1870, before the railroads and the highways, when the wind must have carried the dust all the way to the bay. The soil then must have been pure memory.

I stopped at the edge of a construction site. Machines slept there, hulking like dinosaurs. The night was cold. I thought of Wallace’s office—the text described it as “a small building where Rich’s Drive Inn is located today.” I had eaten there once, long ago. The burgers tasted of aluminum foil and old oil. Perhaps the judge had stood exactly where I once stood waiting for my order, his black coat smelling faintly of tobacco, his hands sticky with law and wheat.

Ghosts always return as investigators. They ask small, impolite questions. They don’t demand justice—they demand remembrance.

III.

I began to collect fragments about him.
From the archives, from forgotten corners of the internet, from local gossip. He was born in San Francisco, 1859, to English parents—Robert and Ann Wallace, “natives of North Shield.” I misread it at first as “North Shield of England,” which sounded mythic, like a lost kingdom. The family moved to California in 1856, then settled in Brentwood around 1870.

He became a justice of the peace, an insurance salesman, and one of the founders of the Bank of Brentwood. He sold coal, wood, and ice to the settlers. I liked that detail. It gave him weight. You could imagine him sweating over the accounts, fingers blackened by coal dust, eyes burning with the excitement of possession.

His house, said the document, was a “beautiful two-story home on Railroad Avenue between Dainty and Pine.” I drove there one morning. The traffic was slow, the light already cruel. At a corner where a CVS Pharmacy stood, I saw what might have been the outline of an older foundation, a faint depression in the sidewalk. I parked the car and walked.

The air smelled of asphalt and hay. A man in a pickup asked if I was lost.
“No,” I said. “Just looking for ghosts.”
He nodded like it made perfect sense.

IV.

I spent that week reading the text again and again. It was written in the flat, dutiful tone of local historians who love their towns too much to see the cracks. But behind the words I felt another rhythm—a tremor, a hesitation. The text wanted to celebrate Wallace, but it couldn’t help revealing the distance between his certainty and our unease.

He had been a member of the Byron Odd Fellows, the Masonic Lodge, the Contra Costa Agricultural Association. He was the sort of man who believed in progress, who probably shook hands like he meant it. And yet what remains of him now? A name on a page, a half-remembered address, the ghosts of wheat fields under supermarket parking lots.

Sometimes, while driving the back roads beyond Vasco Road, I imagined his voice in the wind. A calm English accent, dry, rational. He might have said: You see, young man, we built all this from nothing.
And I would have answered: Yes, Judge, but the nothing might be coming back.

V.

It’s strange to think how history becomes personal. When I was young, I wanted to escape this valley. The hills bored me; the sun felt oppressive. Later, after years in other cities, I came back and found that Brentwood had multiplied like a dream—new houses, new schools, the same restless wind. The past was disappearing so fast that even nostalgia couldn’t keep up.

Reading about Judge Wallace felt like reading about an ancestor I’d never met but somehow remembered. Maybe because he represented that first generation of settlers who believed the land could be possessed, that the future was a blank page for their signatures. I see it as a metaphor: the naïve dream of order built on buried chaos.

Once, walking along the edge of the old Byron Highway, I imagined a scene: the judge and his sons loading bags of wheat onto a wagon. The sun setting behind Mount Diablo, red as a wound. In the distance, native grass still growing wild. A world barely conquered.

The text mentioned his son Richard, who later managed the Bank of Brentwood and became postmaster. I imagined the father’s pride, the son’s weariness. Each generation repeating the same ritual of belonging until the place itself grew tired of them.

VI.

Late one night I dreamed I was inside his office. The room smelled of ink and cold iron. On the wall hung a calendar from 1902. The desk was covered in papers, receipts for coal, letters written in perfect cursive. Outside the window the town was a handful of wooden houses and dirt roads.

He looked up from his chair—tall, clean-shaven, eyes gray as morning fog.
“You’re trespassing,” he said, but not unkindly.
“I’m looking for you,” I said. “For what you left behind.”
He smiled. “All men leave the same thing behind.”
“What’s that?”
“Dust.”

When I woke, the room was full of that same dust, floating in the weak light from the streetlamp. I had left the archive box open. The photocopy lay there like a wound.

VII.

In the following weeks I started seeing his name everywhere: in old deeds, in cemetery records, even on a cracked marble slab near the edge of the Byron Odd Fellows Cemetery. But what interested me most wasn’t the facts—it was the silences between them.

Who were the people he judged? The immigrants, the drifters, the farmhands accused of theft or drunkenness? Did he ever doubt his own verdicts? Did he dream of England, of the cold North Sea wind, of the horizon of another continent?

The text said nothing about that. History rarely does. It speaks only of achievements, not of remorse.

I thought of defeated men chasing the shadows of forgotten poets. That’s what I felt like: another obsessive tracing an absence, a ghost hunting for a ghost.

VIII.

One Sunday, at a flea market outside Oakley, I found an old photograph album. Inside were sepia portraits of unknown families. On the third page, a man with a trimmed beard and a stern gaze sat beside a woman in a lace dress. Someone had written beneath it, in fading ink: “R. Wallace and wife – Brentwood.”

I bought it for five dollars. That night I stared at their faces under the lamp. The woman’s eyes were sharp, almost mocking. His expression was harder to read—somewhere between pride and melancholy. I felt they were judging me across the century.

I imagined telling them: Your fields are gone, your house is a realtor’s office, your descendants live in suburbs named after flowers that never grew here.
They would have nodded, perhaps. Or maybe they would have said: Everything changes, but nothing is lost.

IX.

The haunting deepened in subtle ways.
Once, while waiting at a red light near Sand Creek Road, I saw an old man walking along the shoulder, carrying what looked like a ledger. He was dressed too formally for the heat—dark vest, white shirt, black hat. When I turned for a second look, he was gone.

Another time, while dozing in the public library, I dreamed I was reading a letter written by Judge Wallace to his son. In it, he described the first harvest after the rains, the way the wheat “swayed like a congregation at prayer.” He wrote about his hope that Brentwood would one day be “a place of learning, of law, of righteous men.” The last line said: Guard the land; it remembers.

I woke with the taste of dust in my mouth. The clock said 4:44 p.m.

X.

There is a particular loneliness in researching minor historical figures. They are too small for the history books, too large for gossip. They exist in the interstices—between memory and oblivion.

Sometimes I thought of Judge Wallace as a symbol of the century that followed: the belief that progress was a form of salvation. He built banks, courts, and farms. His world was made of straight lines and clear boundaries. Mine is made of detours and ambiguity.

Yet perhaps we are not so different. Both of us trying to leave marks on the same shifting soil.

I began writing notes for an essay, though I wasn’t sure who it was for. Maybe for the town. Maybe for the dead. Maybe for myself.

XI.

One afternoon, driving west toward Antioch, I stopped by the Point of Timber Cemetery, where the judge had once served as a director. The gate was rusted, the grass high. A few headstones leaned at awkward angles, like tired sailors. The air buzzed with insects.

I walked between the graves, whispering the names aloud. Some were still legible; others had been erased by rain. I found no Wallace there, but I felt a presence—as if the ground itself were waiting for me to speak his story.

I sat on a stone and watched the wind move through the weeds. The world felt suspended, like a page about to turn. In that stillness I realized something simple: the dead don’t haunt us because they want revenge. They haunt us because they want to be remembered correctly.

XII.

After that day, I stopped searching for facts. I began to write him into fiction.

I imagined a young reporter arriving in Brentwood in 1902, working for a small paper called The Contra Costa Beacon. He interviews Judge Wallace about the coming of the railroad. The judge speaks in long, measured sentences. Behind him, the windmill turns slowly. The reporter notices the judge’s hands—scarred, restless—and wonders what those hands have done.

That night the reporter stays at the Rich’s Drive Inn (then a boarding house). In the dark he hears footsteps outside, the creak of a wagon, a door closing softly. He looks out the window and sees the judge walking toward the fields, carrying a lantern. The wheat glows pale under the moon.

The next morning, the judge is gone. Only the lantern remains, burning weakly among the stalks.

XIII.

Fiction can rescue history from its own arrogance. Bolaño knew that. His narrators don’t discover the truth—they circle around it until it becomes something human.

So I wrote another version: a modern narrator (myself, perhaps) discovers the judge’s bones under a new subdivision. The police arrive, confused. The developers want it quiet. The town historian insists it’s a misunderstanding. But the narrator keeps hearing the judge’s voice in the irrigation pipes, in the hum of the transformers. Guard the land; it remembers.

Eventually he realizes the voice isn’t the judge’s at all. It’s the land itself, speaking through borrowed syllables.

XIV.

There is a moment in every investigation when the line between obsession and devotion disappears. I reached it one evening when I caught myself addressing the photocopy as if it were a person.

“Why did you come here, Judge?” I asked. “What were you looking for?”
The page didn’t answer, but the air in the room thickened. Outside, the hills were burning with sunset.

Maybe all of us who return to small towns are judges in disguise—measuring the distance between what was promised and what became.

XV.

I visited his house one last time—or rather, the place where it had stood. The new owners had remodeled it completely. Only the front porch remained original, its wood faded to a ghostly gray.

A woman watering her plants looked at me suspiciously.
“Can I help you?” she asked.
“I think your house used to belong to someone I’m writing about.”
“Oh yeah? Who?”
“Judge Robert Wallace.”
She frowned. “Never heard of him.”

I thanked her and left. As I walked away, I heard the sprinklers start—small arcs of water falling over a manicured lawn where wheat once grew wild.

XVI.

Driving home, I realized that Judge Wallace’s story was less about him than about us—the ones who inherit the silence of the towns we think we know.

Every place has its ghosts but only a few people bother to listen to them. The rest build malls and highways over their bones.

In the distance, Mount Diablo glowed purple. The air smelled faintly of smoke and hay. I thought of the judge, of Kathy Leighton typing her report in 1995, of all the small acts of remembrance that keep the past from dissolving completely.

Maybe that’s what writing is: the modern equivalent of planting wheat. You scatter words into the wind and hope some of them take root.

XVII.

That night I dreamed again of the judge.
He stood in the middle of an endless field, the stalks bending around him like waves. He handed me a sheaf of papers—the same photocopy, but now the words shimmered and changed. I read the last line aloud:

“As I look back once again to the otherside of yesterday, I can’t help but be impressed by Judge Wallace and the pioneers like him that paved the way for East Contra Costa to develop.”

But in the dream, the sentence continued:
“…and yet the land remembers every footprint, every shadow, every silence.”

When I woke, I wrote it down.

XVIII.

Years from now, no one will remember that photocopy. The archives will be digitized, the originals thrown away. But maybe somewhere, under the concrete and the lawns, the seeds of that old wheat still sleep.

I imagine them waiting for a different kind of rain—the kind that falls inside memory. Until then, we keep writing, keep remembering. Judge Wallace, Kathy Leighton, the nameless settlers, the nameless ghosts. All of them part of the same invisible harvest.

Wednesday, September 24, 2025

The Cult of the Vineyards

A Ritual-Drama in Four Movements

(Recovered by an anonymous compiler from a notebook found in a dry field near Brentwood, California. The notebook’s inside cover bears a schedule: “Saturday / 7:30 / 12:00.” What follows, I am persuaded, is not a play but the record of a play performed by those who knew that the world itself is performed.)


Dramatis Personae

  • The Archivist, who narrates and sometimes loses the thread.
  • The Hierophant, a woman whose voice is not hers alone.
  • Six Adepts, neither men nor women until named in the rite.
  • The Vineyard, a chorus of leaves and rows in the guise of wind.
  • The Concrete Threshold, a slab where the sign is drawn.
  • The Empty Field, stage and page.
  • The Notebook of Hours, a prop that remembers.

Movement I: The Threshold of the Letter

(Late afternoon. A concrete path that divides dust from light. At the left edge, a black shoe like the footnote of a vanished author. On the concrete, a figure is traced in water or ash: three vertical segments bound by angles, the old school S that every hand once knew and no one can source. This letter is called by the adepts the Lineage-S, which conjoins six strokes into a single labyrinth.)

ARCHIVIST
I was told the cult met at sundown, when the wind from the Delta cooled the fields and the shadows lengthened into insinuations. They named themselves The Lineage of the Stamen, but they swore by the Lineage-S, the glyph that schoolchildren propagate without genealogy. The Hierophant explained (I preserve her commonplace mysticism) that the sign is the fossil of a secret, the way a river remembers its vanished glacier. She said the letter’s origin is unknowable and thus inexhaustible; every copy restores the source.

(She kneels by the sign with a cotton cord wet from the irrigation ditch and traces its channels. Each stroke is a spoke; each angle, the hinge of an invisible gate.)

HIEROPHANT
Every symbol is a small country from which we exile ourselves by knowing it too well. We will attempt ignorance. We will walk the six streets of the letter without reaching its center.

ADEPTS, in chorus
Let the Lineage be the bridge we cross and never finish crossing.

(A breeze moves the unseen trees. The concrete’s pale austerity becomes a page; the letter, the sentence that begins the world.)

ARCHIVIST
Here the drama begins. I confess I am not impartial. I have traced that letter in the margins of ledgers, on desks, on the breathless cover of a library book; I have imitated its angles as if the geometry could absolve me from invention. Many have said it is a childish emblem. The cult says childhood remembers what maturity must relearn: that six lines can be a destiny.

(They step beyond the slab; each footfall erases the sign’s gleam as water dries. The threshold is crossed by vanishing.)


Movement II: The Vineyard that Speaks

(The path descends into a geometry of vines. Leaves frame the world as if the sky were viewed through the serrated aperture of an emblem. Down the long perspective of the rows, a horizon of palms and houses resembles a painted end-wall.)

VINEYARD, as Chorus in the wind
We are the pages of a book that rewrites its paragraphs nightly. Our ribs remember drought; our grapes remember the invention of sweetness under duress. Walk us as you would a labyrinth: not to escape, but to discover a slower center.

ARCHIVIST
In Brentwood, the vineyards are modest, but they possess the ancient arrogance of agriculture: the will to grid the world. The adepts enter the aisle between vines as actors enter a corridor of probability. The rows run in parallel, like the six strata of the letter—three down, three up; what the hand achieves in seconds, the field rehearses for decades.

ADEPT ONE
The sign’s first stroke.

ADEPT TWO
The second, which cannot forget the first.

ADEPT THREE
The third, which pretends to be the last of the descent.

ADEPT FOUR
The fourth, which begins the ascent.

ADEPT FIVE
The fifth, which corrects our impatience.

ADEPT SIX
The sixth, which claims to finish what cannot be finished.

(They pace forward, then back, switching aisles at measured intervals, stitching the space. The Hierophant remains at the hinge between rows, turning with them as if she were the pivot of a concealed compass.)

HIEROPHANT
To write a letter is to walk. To read it is to be walked. We are written by our habits; we are read by the wind.

ARCHIVIST
I could have left then; what followed is difficult to render without parody. Yet the vineyard’s voice (it was only wind, I assure you) described a doctrine severe and persuasive: that repetition is not the enemy of meaning but its generator. The cult’s rite is the practice of becoming a copy that surpasses its original by duration.

(They stop at the far end where the field opens.)


Movement III: The Empty Field

(The land is a plane of dust subtly ribbed by the memory of machines. Houses keep their distance like quiet witnesses. The sun stoops but does not break. A rectangle of shadow, produced by nothing I could identify, covers a patch of dry grasses; in its center stands the Notebook of Hours, unbound and open.)

ARCHIVIST
The notebook was already there when I first came. It appears in the photographs as an object like any other: bent corners, dirt, the ink’s obstinate survival. Yet it is the play’s axis. On the visible page the same lines are written and erased: Saturday 7:30 – 12:00. The dashes are bars of redaction.

HIEROPHANT
There are two times. One is measured by the hands we don’t possess anymore; the other by intervals that return. We meet between them.

(She lifts the notebook. Dust streams out as if a moth were shaken.)

HIEROPHANT
Listen.

ADEPTS
We listen.

HIEROPHANT
At 7:30 the wind rises, like a book closing on a word it cannot pronounce. At 12:00 the sun writes the same word in white. Between the wind of 7:30 and the noon without shade, this field is a stage on which all former Saturdays are performed again.

ARCHIVIST
She speaks and the field seems to agree. A gullible witness might say that the air tightens. I note only that my shadow lengthened eastward and paused, as if awaiting a cue.

(They divide into two triads, one facing west, one east. The Hierophant, at the center, holds the notebook open to the blank half.)

HIEROPHANT
Name yourselves with names you have never had.

ADEPT ONE
I am the Stone That Remembers Its Quarry.

ADEPT TWO
I am the Line Drawn on Water.

ADEPT THREE
I am the Sixth Version of the First Attempt.

ADEPT FOUR
I am the Palm Tree on the Horizon of Those Who Never Arrive.

ADEPT FIVE
I am the Listener of Dust.

ADEPT SIX
I am the Hour Without a Number.

HIEROPHANT
These names are theatrical masks; keep them until you forget them.

(The triads walk in intersecting diagonals, their feet sketching the S again, monumental yet invisible. Each crossing is rehearsed twice, then thrice, and then—because repetition summons revelation—once more.)

ARCHIVIST
The pattern they inscribe is the letter transposed into geography. Each diagonal pleats the earth; the center (which is nowhere) is reached redundantly. By the tenth crossing I believed I could predict the next. By the fifteenth I was wrong. The ritual demonstrates that prediction and surprise are the same act perceived through different delays.

VINEYARD (a faint rustle from the far edge)
We are listening to the page turn.

HIEROPHANT
Now the memory.

(The adepts gather near the notebook. One by one, they bend and pretend to write, though the page remains unmarked.)

ADEPT ONE
I inscribe the First Memory: a cement slab and the letter no teacher taught me.

ADEPT TWO
The Second Memory: a corridor of leaves, whose shadows repeat the strokes of an alphabet cut by light.

ADEPT THREE
The Third: the field that is a stage and a desert, which expects a word to justify its emptiness.

ADEPT FOUR
The Fourth: the houses that pretend to be distant cities.

ADEPT FIVE
The Fifth: the collector of times, called Saturday.

ADEPT SIX
The Sixth: the noon that erases all names and leaves the act.

HIEROPHANT
The six memories and the six strokes cohere; we are enscripted. Do not mistake this for magic. It is only accuracy.

ARCHIVIST
Borges wrote, somewhere, that to name is to save. The cult, perhaps because the century has grown economical with salvation, believes the inverse: that to name well is to perish tastefully. Their rite proposes a mortal elegance.

(The Hierophant closes the notebook on an unseen sentence and sets it again on the ground.)


Movement IV: The Noon Without Witness

(Time accelerates into interchangeability. The sun attains its plaza of zenith. The field brightens to a single word.)

HIEROPHANT
At noon we perform the Drama of Dispossession. Whoever carries a secret must abandon it to belong to it. Whoever draws the letter must let it be drawn by drought. Whoever speaks must become the echo that corrects him.

ADEPTS, each removing a small object from a pocket
We surrender our reasons.

(One offers a coin pried smooth by years; another, a photograph faded to the color of unwritten paper; another, a key that never opened; another, a folded note; another, a grape shriveled to a raisin; the last offers the cotton cord now dry.)

HIEROPHANT
These are not sacrifices. They are indexes. Every object we owned is a bibliography of our omissions. Let the field be our librarian.

(She distributes the objects at the six terminals of the invisible letter, as if aligning the points of a star with its preceding nights.)

ARCHIVIST
For a moment I believed the ritual complete. But the Hierophant spoke again—the utterance that converts a liturgy into a labyrinth.

HIEROPHANT
Now the Counter-Rite: we play the Drama of Undoing.

ADEPT TWO
We must leave no trace.

HIEROPHANT
Correct. (To the Archivist) You too.

ARCHIVIST
I am only a witness.

HIEROPHANT
Every witness is a conspirator prolonging the crime of happening. Help us erase.

(They step backward along the diagonals, upsetting the dust, confusing the footprints. The adepts retrieve the objects and scatter them farther, or pocket them again, or give them to the Archivist to misplace. The notebook is closed and turned over, so its white page faces the ground that cannot read.)

VINEYARD
A leaf falls. Its choreography corrects the human one.

ARCHIVIST
A scruple compelled me to photograph the notebook before it vanished into my satchel. The image I made is on that very page you hold: a square of white in a field of brittle grass, a faint inscription of hours, my shoes at the bottom like attendants to an altar. I pretended documentation; I enacted theft. In my defense I offer only the law of the cult: that a copy extended in time—be it a letter, a walk, or a photograph—becomes the original by outliving it.

HIEROPHANT
We will meet again when Saturday remembers us. The hour will be 7:30 becoming 12:00. All other hours are glosses.

ADEPTS, dispersing toward the vineyard and the road
We are the Sixth Version of the First Attempt.

(The wind rises. The field returns to its generality: soil, residues, rumor. The Hierophant, whose name I never learned, does not leave. She watches my hesitation.)

HIEROPHANT
You have the page that belongs to the field.

ARCHIVIST
I will return it.

HIEROPHANT
Do not. Return is a story; keeping is a ritual.

(She turns and follows the others among the vines. For a moment, framed by leaves, she is the letter itself.)


Coda: The Commentary That Pretends to Be a Stage Direction

I left the field by the concrete path where the Lineage-S had dried into invisibility. The shoe at the edge of that first photograph was mine. The letter, which the Hierophant called a country, had been the gate and the play. I did not then know that certain signs abandon us only to become our habits. I traced the letter on the dust that clung to my car’s hood and on the condensation of my kitchen’s window, in the margins of a book of Borges (who elucidated, with his normal courtesy, that all letters are maps). I traced it once, absent-mindedly, upon the notebook itself.

I have decided to reproduce the rite for you, reader. It requires only a path, a vineyard or other repeated geometry, a field, and a notebook, which is to say: a sequence of planes. If you lack a vineyard, an alley flanked by garages will suffice; if you cannot find an empty field, a room where furniture has been pushed aside will serve; if you have no notebook, a schedule remembered from childhood is adequate. The movements are simple. At the threshold, draw the letter’s six strokes with water that will forget you. In the geometry, walk forward and back until prediction fails. In the field, name yourself with a name that cannot survive noon. Deposit six objects as an asterisk; retrieve them; then cancel your footprints with other footprints whose intention you refuse to clarify. Finally, hide the notebook somewhere you will not think to search.

If you perform this drama accurately, time will imitate it. Your Saturdays will come disguised as each other. At 7:30 a breeze will edit your plans; at 12:00 a brightness will pretend that plans were never necessary. You will notice that the letter writes you from the inside. You will pretend to be indifferent.

I keep the notebook on a shelf among the fatiguing curiosities of the world. The field, meanwhile, continues without me. The vines rest in their green corridors; the concrete slab returns to dust one fleck at a time; my shoe has extracted itself from the image. Someone—perhaps a boy who has never heard of us—will draw the letter there again, six insolent lines making a house that cannot hold a body, a crest that all nations share. He will not know he is re-enacting our doctrine. He will think he is passing the time.

The last entry in the notebook is not an entry. It is a pleat left by my hand pressing the paper against the field while I took the photograph. The pleat suggests a seventh stroke, which the letter does not have. I have considered this treason and finally adopted it as a commentary. Let the seventh stroke be the pressure of the world; let it be the fold that is not drawn but suffered. The adepts would approve. Their theater preferred the rigor of what cannot be finished.

The ritual has one more direction, appended in a tight marginal script that might be mine or the Hierophant’s: “Erase after reading.” I obey inadequately. I publish this instead. If you think this action violates the cult’s discretion, remember their law: the copy that outlasts becomes the source. I am not betraying; I am founding.

(Lights at noon. Curtain without shadow.)